Friday, May 04, 2007
So, we're out of Iraq, then?
Yesterday, W sent letters to Pelosi and Reid saying he would veto any legislation that would “allow taxpayer dollars to be used for the destruction of human life.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Aaaah... the stupid... it burns!
Since the average age of one of the troops is probably around 20, isn't Bushco paying to have their lives aborted in the 60th trimester?
Wow, a rare photo of the caskets from soldiers that died in Iraq. I thought we public folk weren't supposed to get visuals of that anymore. You know, we such morons that without pictures we don't know about the deaths there.
*THAT* was the Bushco take a way from Vietnam????
Wait, who are the morons again?
"he would veto any legislation that would “allow taxpayer dollars to be used for the destruction of human life."
So why didn't he veto the original authorization for the war, then?
"destruction of human life", better phrased as the destruction of civilian human life. Soldiers are paid to die if necessary.
As harsh as that sounds, that is what we get paid to do.
You guys can watch your little TVs and news about what you think is going on over there. In the mean time we will be there seeing what is really going on over there.
As much as I never want to go there again and as much as I hate the fact that we are there…..we need to be there. We just need to do things in a different manner. Bush is our president and WE elected him to do this job, therefore we need to support him in how he chooses to do it. I am not going to say I feel he is doing a good job over there, but I do agree with him when he says we need people there. I think he needs to rethink how he is handling the matter in Iraq, but I will also agree he is right in leaving us there.
Sssshhhh, here is a little secret “A very large portion of the people there VOLUNTEERED to go.” and I do not mean by just joining the military.
Hoo boy, it's on now...
Post a Comment